response to my semi-satirical review of steig larsson's trilogy ranged and ranged. i'll repeat three points of view that should give you an idea of that range:
yes: 'good job.' from m.l. in chicago.
no: 'I think Academe tends to make intelligent writers hypercritical of fictional villains.' a.s. from greater chicago also had some nice things to say about the column, but this part of his statement does very well represent a point of view.
thought-full: I read today's whodunit and it's, as always, beautifully written and this time, full of surprises. I may be the only person in the world who is not addicted to these Larsson novels. One was quite enough: full of sadism and violence and special effects like the current movies I'm not seeing. But I never thought of them as satire until now, and of course you're right. It's Larsson's final message of disgust. And until you came along, we didn't even realize he was mocking us. from d. l. outside of n.y.
the subject i want to talk about today (in addition to the fact that my blog platform, typepad.com, gives me no control over font size or color) is dennis lehane's Shutter Island
. i saw and was completely pulled in by martin scorsese's film version, so wanted to read the book to see if 1. the film and novel were the same and 2. how i was trapped.
the film is almost exactly the same as the novel. the operative word here is 'almost.' one part that may be different is a part i can't really remember from the film. the prologue of the novel starts with the words, 'from the journals of dr. lester sheehan.' this is a huge bread crumb for the trail the author tells us he leaves. maybe the movie did start this same way and i simply did not process it.
the other part that is somewhat different is the ending. it's still the same enormous plot twist, but in the movie teddy daniels makes an informed choice that is made for him in the novel -- but i'm not sure. on re-reading the last few pages, i see that 'teddy' wakes up in the morning, 'His vision was as clear as it had been when he was a child and his head as well.'
if there is still any one around who has not seen the movie or read the book, do so. you are in for a treat of psychological insight. leonardo di caprio is excellent. is this the same guy i saw as a good romeo just a few years ago? he keeps developing. he truly is a fine actor.
the movie is set in 1954 when conspiracy theories were as much the rage as they are today and pefrontal lobotomies were beginning to be questioned as cures for the criminally insane.
at the beginning we meet u.s. marshall teddy daniels and his partner chuck aule (the name-pun does seem a little out of place now that i'm writing about it). they are on a ferry boat going to shutter island where they hope to find a missing murderess. from there on in, nothing and no one is what it or he or she seems.
well done flick, well written book. the novel is 325 pages. it is published by william morrow.
Recent Comments